Guide for Authors
1

Aims and Scope

 

The Journal

The Kirkuk University Journal for Agricultural Sciences (KUJAS) is an international, peer-reviewed academic journal published by the University of Kirkuk. The journal publishes original research articles that contribute significantly to the advancement of agricultural sciences.

 

The scope

The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to, the following fields:

  • Crop Science
  • Soil Science and Land Resources
  • Horticulture and Forestry
  • Animal Production
  • Agricultural Economics and Extension
  • Food Science and Technology
  • Plant Protection and Biotechnology
  • Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture
2

Language of Publication

 

Language

KUJAS publishes manuscripts exclusively in English starting since 2023.

 

Requirements

  • All submissions must be written in clear, grammatically correct English.
  • Authors whose native language is not English are strongly encouraged to have their manuscripts professionally proofread prior to submission.
  • An Arabic abstract is required in addition to the English abstract, in accordance with national academic publishing regulations.
3

Types of Manuscripts

 

The journal considers

The journal considers the following types of submissions:

  • Original Research Articles
  • Review Articles (by invitation or with prior approval from the Editor-in-Chief)
 

Not considered

Short communications, case reports, and opinion papers are not considered.

4

Submission of Manuscripts

 

Submission

Manuscripts must be submitted electronically through the journal website.

 

Conditions

The submitted manuscript should not have been:

  • Published previously.
  • Under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Submission of a manuscript implies that all authors have approved the final version and agree to its submission to KUJAS.

5

Manuscript Withdrawal Policy

 

Withdrawal Requests

Authors may request withdrawal of a submitted manuscript by sending a written request to the editorial office. The request must be submitted by the corresponding author and must include the manuscript title, submission ID, reason for withdrawal, and confirmation that all authors agree to the withdrawal.

Withdrawal after peer review, acceptance, or production may be subject to editorial assessment, especially if substantial editorial and reviewer resources have already been used.

KUJAS reserves the right to reject future submissions from authors who repeatedly withdraw manuscripts without valid reasons after peer review or acceptance.
6

Initial Technical Screening Checklist

 

Technical Compliance Screening

Before peer review, all submissions are checked by the editorial office for technical compliance. This screening does not evaluate the scientific quality of the manuscript; it verifies whether the submission meets the minimum editorial requirements of KUJAS.

Manuscripts may be returned to authors before peer review if one or more of the following items are missing or incomplete:

  • Manuscript prepared according to the KUJAS template.
  • Title, authors’ names, affiliations, and corresponding author details are complete.
  • English abstract and Arabic abstract are provided as required.
  • Keywords are included.
  • All tables and figures are cited in the text and presented clearly.
  • References are formatted according to KUJAS requirements and include DOI links where available.
  • Ethical approval statement is provided when the study involves animals or human participants.
  • Data Availability Statement is included.
  • Conflict of Interest statement is included.
  • Funding statement is included.
  • Similarity report concerns, if any, are acceptable for editorial assessment.
Failure to meet these requirements may result in administrative return or rejection before peer review.
7

Peer Review Process

 

Process

KUJAS follows a double-blind peer review process to ensure objectivity and academic integrity.

  • Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise.
  • The identities of authors and reviewers are concealed throughout the review process.
 

Decision

Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the editorial decision may be:

  • Accept
  • Minor revision
  • Major revision
  • Reject

The average review period is 6–8 weeks, depending on the responsiveness of reviewers and authors.

8

Manuscript Preparation

 

General Format

  • Manuscripts should be prepared using Microsoft Word.
  • Font: Times New Roman, size 12
  • Line spacing: 1.5
  • Pages should be numbered consecutively.
 

Structure of the Manuscript

Manuscripts should be organized in the following order:

  1. Title
  2. Authors’ names and affiliations
  3. Abstract (250-300 words) (English)
  4. Keywords (5–7)
  5. Introduction
  6. Materials and Methods
  7. Results
  8. Discussion
  9. Conclusion (if applicable)
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References
9

Abstract and Keywords

 

Abstract

  • The English abstract should not exceed 250-300 words.
  • It must clearly state:
  • The purpose of the study
  • Methodology
  • Key results
  • Main conclusions
 

Keywords

  • Authors must provide 5–7 keywords that are not already included in the title.

An Arabic abstract should be provided on a separate page.

10

References

 

Requirements

  • References must follow the APA citation style.
  • Authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of all references.
  • Where available, DOIs must be included at the end of each reference.
 

Example

Example:

Author(s). (Year). Title of the article. Journal Title, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
11

Publication Ethics

 

COPE

KUJAS adheres to the principles and guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

 

Plagiarism

  • All submissions are screened for plagiarism.
  • Manuscripts with significant similarity to previously published work will be rejected.
 

Authorship

  • Authorship should reflect significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study.
  • Any changes to authorship after submission must be approved by all authors and the Editor-in-Chief.

Author Contributions

KUJAS requires authors to describe the individual contribution of each author. The contribution statement should be included before the References section or in a separate declaration section.

Authors may use the CRediT taxonomy where applicable, including:

  • Conceptualization
  • Methodology
  • Software
  • Validation
  • Formal Analysis
  • Investigation
  • Resources
  • Data Curation
  • Writing – Original Draft
  • Writing – Review and Editing
  • Visualization
  • Supervision
  • Project Administration
  • Funding Acquisition

All listed authors must have made a substantial scholarly contribution to the work and must approve the submitted and final versions of the manuscript.

Changes in Authorship

Any request to add, remove, or rearrange authors after submission must be submitted in writing to the editorial office. The request must include a clear explanation for the change and written approval from all authors, including any author being added or removed.

KUJAS does not allow authorship changes after acceptance unless there is a strong and documented reason. The Editor-in-Chief has the final authority to approve or reject authorship change requests.

 

Conflict of Interest

Authors must disclose any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest that could influence the research or its interpretation.

Conflict of Interest Declaration

All authors must disclose any financial, personal, institutional, or professional relationships that could influence, or be perceived to influence, the research, interpretation of results, or editorial handling of the manuscript.

If there is no conflict of interest, authors must include the following statement:

“The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.”

If a conflict exists, authors must describe its nature clearly in the manuscript. Failure to disclose a relevant conflict of interest may result in rejection, correction, or retraction, depending on the stage at which the issue is identified.

12

Funding Statement

 

Funding Disclosure

Authors must disclose all sources of financial support received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of the article. The funding statement should include the name of the funding agency, grant number, and the role of the funder, if any.

If the research received no external funding, authors must include the following statement:

“This research received no external funding.”

If the funder had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing, or publication decision, this should be clearly stated.

13

Ethical Approval

 

Ethical Approval

For studies involving animals or human participants:

  • Authors must state that the research was conducted in accordance with relevant ethical standards.
  • Approval from an appropriate ethics committee must be clearly indicated.
15

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

 

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

All articles published in KUJAS are assigned a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) to ensure permanent accessibility and citation.

16

Production Workflow After Acceptance

 

Production Stage

After acceptance, the manuscript enters the production stage. This may include copyediting, formatting according to the KUJAS template, author proof review, final PDF preparation, DOI registration, and online publication.

Authors are responsible for checking the final proof carefully. Only minor corrections related to typographical errors, author information, formatting, and production mistakes are allowed at proof stage. Major scientific changes are not permitted after acceptance unless requested by the editorial office.

The article is published online after completion of production requirements and payment of the applicable APC.

17

Generative AI (GenAI) Policy

 

Policy Statement

The Kirkuk University Journal for Agricultural Sciences (KUJAS) acknowledges the growing use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools in scholarly publishing. This policy ensures transparency, accountability, and research integrity.

 

Use by Authors

  • Authors may use GenAI tools for language editing or formatting assistance only.
  • GenAI tools must not be listed as authors.
  • Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of their work.
  • Any use of GenAI must be clearly disclosed in the manuscript.
 

Restrictions

  • GenAI must not be used to generate scientific data, results, or conclusions without proper validation.
  • Any form of fabrication or manipulation using AI tools is prohibited.
 

Reviewers and Editors

  • Reviewers must not upload manuscripts to AI tools.
  • Editors may use AI tools for support but must ensure decisions are independent.
  • Non-compliance may result in rejection or retraction.
18

Editorial Disclaimer

 

Editorial Disclaimer

The views expressed in published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial board or the University of Kirkuk.