[1] El-Mansy, Y.M. (2015). Relative efficiency of direct and indirect selection with selection indices for improving some economic characters in cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) J. Agric. Res. Kafr El-Sheikh Univ., 41 (1): 192- 215.
[2] Al-Jomaily, A. R. A. (2010). Evaluation Performances of Upland Cotton Genotypes and Estimate Some Parameters Genetic and Path Analysis. College of Agriculture and Forestry University of Mosul.
[3] Oosterhout, D. A. loka, Tyson b. raper (2013). P0tassium and stress alleviation physiological functions and management of cotton. Journal of plant nutrition and soil science. 176(3): 331- 343.
[4] Ali, H., D. Muhammad, and S.A. Abid 2005. Weed Control Practices in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Planted on the Bed and Furrow Pak .J. Weeds. Res, 11(1-2):43- 48.
[5] Al-Zubaidy K M D and M A H Al-Falahy (2016) Principles and Procedures of Statistics and Experimental Designs. Republic of the Iraq University of Duhok, Kurdistan Region / Iraq College of Agriculture, Ministry of Higher Education And Scientific Research, Field Crops Department.
[6] Smith, H.F. (1936). A discriminant function for plant selection Ann.Eugen.7:240-250.
[7] Hazel, L.N. (1943) the genetic bases for the construction selection index. Genetics.28:476-490.
[8] AL-Rawi. K.M. and A.A. Ahmed (1984). Evaluation of the relief efficiencies of several selection indices for predicting yield performances in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Iraqi. J. Agric. sci. (zanco) 2:15-27.
[9] Al-zubaidy KMD, and KKA, Al-jubory (2016). Design and Analysis of Genetically Experiments. Dar alwadah for Kingdom-Amman library, printing, and distribution. The Republic of Iraq.
[10] Miller, P.A., J. C. Williams, H. F. Robinson and R. E. Comstock (1958). Estimation of genotypic and environmental variances and covariance in upland cotton and their implication in selection. Agron. J. 50:126-131.
[11] Dawod, K. M; Khalid, K. A; M. I. Mohammed (2013) Heterosis and Combining Ability for Seed Cotton Yield and Its Components Using F2diallel Crosses. University Of Kirkuk Journal of Agriculture Sciences. Special Issue: 542-560.
[12]Dawod, K. M; Abdulslam R. A. Al-Jomaily, Mohammed I. M. Al-Ugady, and Yassir H. S. AL-Aaty (2016). Stability Parameters for Yield and Some of Its Components in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Tikrit University Journal of Agriculture Sciences 16(3): 28-39.
[13] Mohammed I. M. (2014). Estimation of Genetic Diversity in a Number of Cotton Varieties by using Cluster Analysis and Its Relation with Gene Action in Half-Diallel Crossing. University Of Kirkuk Journal of Agriculture Sciences. 7 (4):120-135.
[14] Sarteb, M. M; Mohammed, I. M. (2023) Genotype × Environment interaction for genotype cotton upland Gossypium hirsutum L. Earth and Environmental Science Volume 2196: 000-000 (Acceptable for publication).
[15] Deho Z. A. (2023) Planting Dates Effects on Seed Cotton Yield And Contributed Characters of Cotton Advance Lines under Changing Climatic Conditions of Tandojam, Sindh Pakistan. Pak. J. Agri., Agril. Engg. Vet. Sci., 39 (1): 10-15.
[16] Riaz A. Ullah F. Chohan Sm. Saeed A. Aqeel M. Sher A. Nadeem A. Akram M. Shahid M. Hussnain H. Khalid Mn. (2023) Estimation Of Heterosis And Combining Ability Effects For Yield And Fiber Quality Traits In Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal: 261: 1-7.
[17] EI- Fesheikawy, A. B. A; M.E. Abdel – salam and B. M. Ramdan, (2014). Application of some selection indices in fairly segregation generations of barbadense cotton. J. plant production, Mansoura univ, voi. 5(7):1317 – 1329.
[18] Mahmoud. A (2020) used a selection index for improving some economic traits in cotton (Gossypium. barbadense L.). Egypt .J. Plant breed. 24(1):21- 40.
[19]Mabrouk. A. H. (2020) Application of some selection procedures for improving some economic characteristics in cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.). J. Plant prod .5:365 – 383.
[20] Ramdan, B. M. (2021). Genetic gain and selection criteria effects on lint yield and yield components in segregating population (Giza 88 x A13), J. Plant prod. voi. 6:165 – 178.