Winter Forcing of Apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) Cuttings for Bud Induction to Enhance Explant Availability in Tissue Culture Applications

Volume 17, Issue 1
Winter 2026
Page 124-132

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Horticulture, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, Duhok University, Duhok, IRAQ.

2 University of Duhok

Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of plant growth regulators, specifically benzyladenine (BA) and gibberellic acid (GA₃), on winter apple bud forcing, bud break characteristics, and subsequent tissue culture performance of six apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars. One year old semi-woody cuttings of Golden Delicious, Red Delicious, Barwary, Anna, Dwarf Apple and Granny Smith were subjected to cold pre-treatments (4°C) using BA and GA₃ at four combinations: 0:0, 0:10, 10:0, and 10:10 mg.l-1. Results showed that all the treatments significantly reduced the days to bud break, with the 10:10 mg.l-1combination yielding the fastest response (22 days), compared to 28.67 days in control. Bud break percentage and bud vigor were also significantly enhanced, particularly under the combined BA plus GA₃ treatment, reaching up to 100% bud break in Red Delicious and Anna. Bud vigor improved from weak (control) to strong under optimal treatment in most cultivars. The sustainability of flushed buds on MS medium was highest under the combined treatment, with Red Delicious, Barwary and Granny Smith showing 65–70% viability, while Dwarf Apple remained poorly responsive. To improve explant survival, antioxidants (citric and ascorbic acid) and activated charcoal (1.5 g.l-1) were tested. Activated charcoal significantly enhanced survival rates, reaching 100% in Granny Smith and 95% in Barwary, compared to 3.3% in the untreated control. Cultivar differences were evident throughout the study. In conclusion, combining BA and GA₃ with activated charcoal provides an effective strategy for year-round micropropagation of apple, with cultivar-specific responses warranting tailored protocols. Thus, this work will serve as a source for future apple micropropagation commercial projects.

Keywords

Subjects
[1].Dias, C. M., & Vieira, J. G. (2021). The role of benzyladenine in bud dormancy release of temperate fruit trees. Horticultural Reviews, 48, 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119634296.ch4
[2].Singh, D., & Singh, S. (2020). Role of antioxidants and activated charcoal in reducing phenolic exudation during apple tissue culture. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 26, 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00780-2
[3].Wang, H., & Zhao, Q. (2023). Plant growth regulators and environmental cues regulate bud dormancy release in fruit trees: A review. Plants, 12(4), 734. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040734
[4].Gao, L., Li, F., & Zhang, M. (2020). Effects of BA and GA on bud break and shoot growth in apple cultivars during dormancy. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 581936. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.581936
[5].Li, X., Zhang, J., & Wu, Z. (2023). Advances in bud dormancy and bud break mechanisms in temperate fruit trees. Horticulture Research, 10, uhac078. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhac078
[6]. Wang, H., & Zhao, Q. (2023). Plant growth regulators and environmental cues regulate bud dormancy release in fruit trees: A review. Plants, 12(4), 734. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040734
[7].Mustafa, G., & Ahmad, S. (2022). Impact of gibberellins and cytokinins on bud dormancy breaking in apple cultivars under cold storage. Scientia Horticulturae, 292, 110673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110673
[8].Ma, W., & Luo, X. (2020). Optimization of growth regulator concentrations for enhanced micropropagation of apple rootstocks. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 140(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-019-01700-5
[9].SAS. (2001). SAS/ STAT User’s Guide for Personal Computers. Release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.
[10].        Zhang, T., & Li, Z. (2021). Effect of GA and BA on bud break and tissue culture initiation of apple cultivars. Horticultural Science, 48(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI15784-20
[11].        He, Y., Liu, X., & Sun, Y. (2022). Activated charcoal improves in vitro culture survival and reduces phenolic oxidation in apple explants. Plant Cell Reports, 41(8), 1647–1657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-022-02859-7
[12].        Singh, D., & Singh, S. (2020). Role of antioxidants and activated charcoal in reducing phenolic exudation during apple tissue culture. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 26, 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00780-2
[13].        Toma, R. S., Danial, G. H., & Habash, A. N. (2012). In vitro morphogenetic response of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) and pear (Pyrus communis L.) to the elevated levels of copper and myo-inositol. Acta Agrobotanica, 65(3).