Correlations and Path Coefficient Analysis Between Yield and Related Traits for a Set of Soybean Genetic Compositions

Volume 17, Issue 2
Spring 2026
Page 24-31

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Horticulture and Landscape, College of Agriculture, University of Kerbala, Kerbela IRAQ

2 Department of Field Crops, College of Agriculture, University of Kerbala, Kerbela, IRAQ

3 Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University: Almusaib Technical College, Almusaib IRAQ

4 Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, Ankara, 06110 Ankara, Turkiye.

Abstract
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) is one of the most important oilseed and grain-legume crops in the world and is regarded as a promising crop in Iraq. A field experiment was conducted at the Technical College / Al-Musaib during the 2025 growing season using a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The study aimed to evaluate correlation and path coefficients among several morphological and physiological traits of six soybean genetic compositions in order to identify the traits that directly or indirectly contribute to increasing total plant yield. The results showed clear variation among the studied genetic compositions in vegetative and yield-related traits, reflecting differences in their response to environmental conditions. Environmental correlation coefficients were weak and non-significant for most evaluated traits. In contrast, genetic correlation analysis revealed that dry matter weight, pod number, seeds per pod, protein percentage, and harvest index exhibited positive genetic correlations with yield. Among these, dry matter weight showed the highest positive correlation with total yield (0.985). The strongest negative correlations were recorded for pod number and seeds per pod, reaching -1.000. In contrast, 100-seed weight showed the weakest association, with low and non-significant coefficients. Phenotypic correlation coefficients ranged from moderate to high, but were generally lower than the corresponding genetic correlations while following the same trend. Path coefficient analysis indicated that dry matter weight had the highest positive direct effect on yield (0.679), followed by protein percentage, which showed a moderate positive direct effect (0.328). In contrast, pod number had a negative and non-significant direct effect (-0.011), although it exerted considerable indirect effects through other traits. Oil percentage showed negative direct and indirect effects, indicating that it is among the least suitable traits for selection. Accordingly, dry matter weight and protein percentage may be considered the most efficient selection criteria for improving soybean yield.

Keywords

Subjects
[1].   Thapar, A. (2021). The Role of Plant Growth Regulators in Influencing Lowest Pod Height in Soybean (Master’s thesis).
[2].   Sugiyama, M., Matsumiya, K., Samoto, M., & Matsumura, Y. (2022). Elucidation of a new fractionation method to understand the protein composition of soybean seeds. Food Chemistry Advances1, 100115.
[3].   Modgil, R., Tanwar, B., Goyal, A., & Kumar, V. (2020). Soybean (glycine max). In Oilseeds: health attributes and food applications (pp. 1-46). Singapore: Springer Singapore
[4].   Medic, J., Atkinson, C., & Hurburgh Jr, C. R. (2014). Current knowledge in soybean composition. Journal of the American oil chemists' society, 91(3), 363-384.
[5].   Kutlu, H. R. (2010). Tüm yönleriyle silaj yapımı ve silajla besleme. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
[6].   Sousa, C. L. M., Souza, M. O., Oliveira, L. M., & Pelacani, C. R. (2014). Effect of priming on germinability and salt tolerance in seeds and saplings of Physalis peruviana L. African Journal of Biotechnology, 13(19), 1955–1960.
[7].   Al-Turayhi, M. S. M. (2024). Seed Priming and Planting Dates and Their Effects on Growth, Seed Yield, and Seed Quality in Soybean (Doctoral dissertation). University of Baghdad.
[8].   Ghanbari, S., Nooshkam, A., Fakheri, B. A., & Mahdinezhad, N. (2018). Assessment of yield and yield component of soybean genotypes (Glycine max L.) in north of Khuzestan. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 21(5), 435–441.
[9].   Mehra, S., Shrivastava, M. K., Amrate, P. K., & Yadav, R. B. (2020). Studies on variability, correlation coefficient and path analysis for yield associated traits in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 37(1), 56–59.
[10].  Al-Jibouri, H. A., Miller, P. A., & Robinson, H. F. (1958). Genotypic and environmental variances in an upland cotton cross of interspecific origin. Agronomy Journal, 50(10), 633–636.
[11].  Dewey, D. R., & Lu, K. H. (1959). A correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agronomy Journal, 51(9), 515–518.
[12].  Jarallah, M. H., & Alnuaimi, J. J. J. (2025). Path coefficient analysis in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics, 57(3), 1215–1222.
[13].  Zeba, N., Rasal-Monir, M., Modak, S., Sarker, A., & Rahaman, M. A. (2022). Genetic variability, correlation co-efficient and path analysis in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) genotypes. Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Researc
[14].  Jawad, A. A., Jader, J. J., & Hassoun, A. S. (2025). Study of vegetative growth characteristics of five soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes under the influence of planting dates. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1487(1).
[15].  Al-Jumaili, J. M. A., & Sarhan, I. A. (2010). Effect of plant densities and split application of potassium fertilizer in batches on the growth, yield, and quality of two soybean cultivars (Glycine max L. Merrill). Al-Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(4), 373–393.
[16].  Singh, R. K., & Chaudhary, B. D. (1985). Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publishers.
[17].  Turner, M. E., & Stevens, C. D. (1959). The regression analysis of causal paths. Biometrics, 15(2), 236–258
[18].  Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, 557–585.
[19].  Li, C. C. (1956). The concept of path coefficient and its effect on population genetics. Biometrics, 12(2), 190–210.
[20].  Lenka, D., & Misra, B. (1973). Path coefficient analysis of yield in rice cultivars. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 43, 376–379
[21].  Lawal, I. T., Alake, C. O., Porbeni, J. B., Olorunmaiye, P. M., Oyetunde, O. A., & Ogunniyan, D. J. (2025). Studies on heritability and character relationship in soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) genotypes grown in two contrasting environments. Journal of Genetics Genomics and Plant Breeding, 9.
[22].  Hızlı, H., Çubukçu, P., & Şahar, A. K. (2023). Path analysis, genetic variability and correlation studies of related characters for forage soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merill). Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 1513–1528.
[23].  Chandel, K., Patel, N., Sharma, L., & Gali, S. (2017). Genetic variability, correlation coefficient and path analysis for yield and yield attributing characters in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Green Farming, 8(3), 547–551.