Effect of Soil Physical and Organic Matter on Soil Erodibility in Duhok Dam Sub Drainage Basin

10.58928/ku26.17304
Volume 17, Issue 3
Summer 2026
Page 29-37

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Soil and Water Science, Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Duhok

Abstract
Soil erosion is a barrier to achieving sustainable land use especially in semi-arid regions with multiple soil types. This work evaluates the soil erodibility factor (K) at twelve sampling locations in Duhok Dam (Kurdistan Region, Iraq). The investigates impact of key physical and chemical soil properties including Bulk density, permeability, organic matter, textural and structural properties of these soil samples. Organic matter content and soil texture were found to be the major drivers for controlling K-factor under different land uses, according the sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity to erosion decreased with increasing clay content of the soils, while sandy soils suffered from greater susceptibility to the erosion because of their lower permeability. The k-values had been predicted by a regression model, which accounted for 98.66% of the total variance (R2 = 98.6%). The increasing of bulk density and permeability have variable effects on erodibility. Study of various soil properties show significant correlations between Bulk density, erodibility (K), permeability and OM content indicating useful information about the behavior and erosiveness property of the soil. The positive relationship between erodibility and bulk density implies that denser soils are more easily eroded, possibly because reduced porosity in such soils results in increased surface runoff. It is also interesting to note that as the erodibility increases, the permeability of soils tends to increase, thus, with greater water movement in susceptible soils, detachment and transport of particles could be quickened. On the other hand, the soil bulk density had a negative relationship with organic matter content, which is evidence of the importance of organic materials for maintaining good soil structure and reducing compaction. This emphasizes the interdependence between soil physical properties and their joint impact on land degradation, and draws attention for integrated soil management strategies aimed at mitigating the risk of erosion in vulnerable catchments.

Keywords

Subjects
[1].   Blake, G.R. and Hartge, K.H., 1986. Bulk density. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 Physical and mineralogical methods5, pp.363-375.
[2].   Boardman, J., 2006. Soil erosion science: Reflections on the limitations of current approaches. Catena68(2-3), pp.73-86.
[3].   Cunningham, F., Amode, M.R., Barrell, D., Beal, K., Billis, K., Brent, S., Carvalho-Silva, D., Clapham, P., Coates, G., Fitzgerald, S. and Gil, L., 2015. Ensembl 2015. Nucleic acids research43(D1), pp.D662-D669.
[4].   Dangler, E.W., 1976. Erodibility of selected Hawaii soils by rainfall simulation (Vol. 35). Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.
[5].   de Oliveira, E.P., Burini, R.C. and Jeukendrup, A., 2014. Gastrointestinal complaints during exercise: prevalence, etiology, and nutritional recommendations. Sports Medicine44(Suppl 1), pp.79-85.
[6].   Ernst, L.F., 1971. Analysis of groundwater flow to deep wells in areas with a non-linear function for the subsurface drainage. Journal of Hydrology14(2), pp.158-180.
[7].   Ezeabasili, A.C.C., Okoro, B.U. and Ezeabasili, A.I., 2014. Water resources: management and strategies in Nigeria. AFRREV STECH: An International Journal of Science and Technology3(1), pp.35-54.
[8].   Ezeh, C.U., 2024. Revised: 04* December, 26* December 2024, 02 January 2024 Accepted: 15* November 2024 Date of Publication: 15 June 2024 DOI-https://doi. org/1020319/lijhls. 202495161 This paper can be cited as: Ezeh, C. UI, Preko, K., Adjei, K., Igwe, O., Schönbrodt-Stitt, S., Asare, MY.
[9].   Foster, G.R., W.H. Wischmeier, and D.A. Moldenhauer. (1981). Soil Erosion and Irrigation. In: Irrigation of Agricultural Crops, Agronomy Monograph No. 30, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 557–582.
[10].    Grosbellet, C., Vidal-Beaudet, L., Caubel, V. and Charpentier, S., 2011. Improvement of soil structure formation by degradation of coarse organic matter. Geoderma162(1-2), pp.27-38.
[11].    Honarpour, M. and Mahmood, S.M., 1988. Relative-permeability measurements: An overview. Journal of petroleum technology40(08), pp.963-966.
[12].    Kinnell, P.I.A., 2010. Event soil loss, runoff and the Universal Soil Loss Equation family of models: A review. Journal of hydrology385(1-4), pp.384-397.
[13].    Knapen, A., Poesen, J., Govers, G., Gyssels, G. and Nachtergaele, J., 2007. Resistance of soils to concentrated flow erosion: A review. Earth-Science Reviews80(1-2), pp.75-109.
[14].    Makovníková, Jarmila, et al. "Comparison of different models for predicting soil bulk density. Case study–Slovakian agricultural soils." International agrophysics 31.4 (2017): 491-498.
[15].    Martins, C.R., Gordia, A.P., Silva, D.A.S., Quadros, T.M.B.D., Ferrari, E.P., Teixeira, D.M. and Petroski, E.L., 2012. Insatisfação com a imagem corporal e fatores associados em universitários. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal)17, pp.241-246.
[16].    Nelson, D.W. and Sommers, L.E., 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods5, pp.961-1010.
[17].    Panagos, P., Meusburger, K., Ballabio, C., Borrelli, P. and Alewell, C., 2014. Soil erodibility in Europe: A high-resolution dataset based on LUCAS. Science of the total environment479, pp.189-200.
[18].    Parr, R.G., 1960. Three remarks on molecular orbital theory of complex molecules. The Journal of Chemical Physics33(4), pp.1184-1199.
[19].    Poesen, J.W.A. and Torri, D., 1989. Mechanisms governing incipient motion of ellipsoidal rock fragments in concentrated overland flow. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms14(6), pp.469-480.
[20].    Renard, K.G., 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.
[21].    Römkens, R., 1997. Prevalence of wife abuse in the Netherlands: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in survey research. Journal of interpersonal violence12(1), pp.99-125.
[22].    Ryan, J., Estefan, G. and Rashid, A., 2001. Soil and plant analysis laboratory manual. ICARDA.
[23].    Tejada, M. and Gonzalez, J.L., 2006. Crushed cotton gin compost on soil biological properties and rice yield. European journal of Agronomy25(1), pp.22-29.
[24].    Thomas, P.A., Liu, H. and Umberson, D., 2017. Family relationships and well-being. Innovation in aging1(3), p.igx025.
[25].    Thounaojam, J.S. and Ibotombi, S., 2024. Influence of Clay on Soil Erodibility and Landslides: Some Examples from Manipur, Northeast India. Indian Geotechnical Journal54(6), pp.2110-2125.
[26].    Williams, D.R. and Collins, C., 1995. US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations. Annual review of sociology21(1), pp.349-386.
[27].    Wischmeier, W.H. and Mannering, J.V., 1969. Relation of soil properties to its erodibility. Soil science society of America journal33(1), pp.131-137.
[28].    Wischmeier, W.H., Johnson, C.B. and Cross, B.V., 1971. A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites.
[29].    Young, R. and Mutchler, C. 1977. ‘Erodibility of some Minnesota soils’, J. Soil Wat. Cons.32, 180–183.
[30].    Zanetta, G., Chiari, S., Rota, S., Bratina, G., Maneo, A., Torri, V. and Mangioni, C., 1997. Conservative surgery for stage I ovarian carcinoma in women of childbearing age. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology104(9), pp.1030-1035.